<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post3816846889452531525..comments</id><updated>2008-04-28T01:51:07.609-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Clockskew: New iPod Nano Size Analysis</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/feeds/3816846889452531525/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html'/><author><name>jdq</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>5</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-3502694531413526715</id><published>2007-09-01T09:19:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-09-01T09:19:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comment from Predicciones sobre los nuevos iPod:

...</title><content type='html'>&lt;em&gt;Comment from Predicciones sobre los nuevos iPod:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[...] observamos el estudio matemático que realizaron en Clockskew, o hacemos caso al anuncio filtrado de unas nuevas fundas de la empresa Uniea, donde lo llaman [...]</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/3502694531413526715'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/3502694531413526715'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html?showComment=1188656340000#c3502694531413526715' title=''/><author><name>Webmaster</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16069521304058055013</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07208756541071220934'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-3816846889452531525' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/posts/default/3816846889452531525' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-1987370022162918914</id><published>2007-08-25T09:17:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-08-25T09:17:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comment from Le nouveau iPod Nano : le gros Nano -...</title><content type='html'>&lt;em&gt;Comment from Le nouveau iPod Nano : le gros Nano - Papy Geek - Blog Geek, Informatique, Web, Stuff, Software, Vidéos et Insolite !:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[...] l&amp;#8217;analyse faite des photos, la taille de l&amp;#8217;appareil pourrait être celle-ci comparée aux anciens iPod [...]</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/1987370022162918914'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/1987370022162918914'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html?showComment=1188051420000#c1987370022162918914' title=''/><author><name>Webmaster</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16069521304058055013</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07208756541071220934'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-3816846889452531525' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/posts/default/3816846889452531525' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-1372514195392545390</id><published>2007-08-25T01:51:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-08-25T01:51:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comment from David:

Excellent point.  A ~25% incr...</title><content type='html'>&lt;em&gt;Comment from David:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Excellent point.  A ~25% increase in face surface is not a small increase.  It has to be a merging of the nano and iPod so that a completely different iPod can be released--touch-screen iPod.  A shuffle, a fat-nano, and an iPod Touch could be the line-up.  Or the leaked pic could be fake and we are all wasting our time. :)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/1372514195392545390'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/1372514195392545390'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html?showComment=1188024660000#c1372514195392545390' title=''/><author><name>Webmaster</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16069521304058055013</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07208756541071220934'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-3816846889452531525' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/posts/default/3816846889452531525' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-2563930911742406265</id><published>2007-08-25T01:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-08-25T01:44:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comment from Mathelete:

You should also write tha...</title><content type='html'>&lt;em&gt;Comment from Mathelete:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You should also write that the face is going to be roughly 23% larger than the old nano according to your estimates... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The math is such:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Area of nano = 1.6 x 3.5 = 5.6&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Area of fatso = 2.3 x 3 = 6.9&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6.9 / 5.6 = 1.23... so it's 123% of the area of the nano  - meaning its got a 23% bigger face.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/2563930911742406265'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/2563930911742406265'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html?showComment=1188024240000#c2563930911742406265' title=''/><author><name>Webmaster</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16069521304058055013</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07208756541071220934'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-3816846889452531525' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/posts/default/3816846889452531525' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-243440628312490714</id><published>2007-08-24T17:48:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-08-24T17:48:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comment from Fat Nano™ Sized: Maybe It’s Just Big ...</title><content type='html'>&lt;em&gt;Comment from Fat Nano™ Sized: Maybe It&amp;#8217;s Just Big Form-Factored?:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[...] New iPod Nano Size Analysis [ClockSkew]  [...]</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/243440628312490714'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/3816846889452531525/comments/default/243440628312490714'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html?showComment=1187995680000#c243440628312490714' title=''/><author><name>Webmaster</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16069521304058055013</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07208756541071220934'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.clockskew.com/2007/08/new-ipod-nano-size-analysis.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6635701115953102242.post-3816846889452531525' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6635701115953102242/posts/default/3816846889452531525' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>